MUD Hosting directory

Pros

• + Excellent documentation for Linux beginners
• + Snapshot feature allows for full-disk backups before code changes
• + Global data center locations for low player latency

Cons

• − Higher cost per GB of RAM compared to budget providers
• − Bandwidth overage charges can be steep

Pros

• + Industry-leading price-to-performance ratio
• + Native IPv6 support included
• + Fast NVMe storage for quick world-file saves

Cons

• − Identity verification process can be strict
• − Primary data centers are located in Europe

Pros

• + Free tier includes 50 monitors at 5-minute intervals
• + Supports custom port monitoring (e.g., 4000, 23)
• + Mobile app alerts for immediate crash notification

Cons

• − Free tier does not include heartbeat monitoring
• − SMS alerts require a paid plan

Pros

• + Supports over 40 different cloud storage backends
• + Can be easily scripted into a cron job
• + Encryption options for sensitive player data

Cons

• − Command-line only interface
• − Requires manual configuration for each provider

Pros

• + Reduces resource waste from bot connection attempts
• + Highly customizable filter rules for specific MUD logs
• + Lightweight and runs in the background

Cons

• − Can accidentally ban legitimate players with unstable connections
• − Requires log parsing configuration

Pros

• + Simple integration via curl or wget
• + Alerts you if a backup script fails to complete
• + Generous free tier for personal projects

Cons

• − Only monitors script execution, not server health
• − Requires internet connectivity from the host

Pros

• + Secure SSH access without opening port 22 to the world
• + Easy setup on Linux, Windows, and mobile
• + Works across NAT and firewalls

Cons

• − Requires installing a client on all admin devices
• − Adds a dependency on a third-party identity provider

Pros

• + Keeps sessions alive when switching between Wi-Fi and LTE
• + Provides local echo for reduced perceived latency
• + Excellent for quick admin fixes on the go

Cons

• − Requires a range of UDP ports to be open on the firewall
• − Does not support scrollback in the same way SSH does

Pros

• + Simple VM provisioning
• + Good documentation for Linux networking and firewalls
• + Predictable pricing tiers

Cons

• − Self-managed infrastructure
• − Advanced networking features may increase complexity

Pros

• + Isolates legacy library dependencies from the host OS
• + Easily replicate the exact build environment across servers
• + Simplifies migration between different hosting providers

Cons

• − Requires learning Docker containerization
• − Slight overhead compared to bare-metal execution

Pros

• + Significantly cheaper than Amazon S3
• + No minimum storage duration
• + Simple API compatible with S3 tools

Cons

• − Egress fees apply when downloading backups
• − Web interface is basic

Pros

• + Per-second granularity for performance metrics
• + Zero-configuration auto-detection of system services
• + Beautiful web-based dashboard for resource tracking

Cons

• − Can be resource-intensive on very small VPS instances
• − Collects a vast amount of data that may be overkill for simple MUDs